When using autocomplete to return field values I
missed, that autocomplete had the feature that cut
values at dots. So instead of returning full field
values only the prefix up to the first dot was
returned.
Fixed by making the cut-at-dot feature optional.
We had a method that returned the values of a field
with respect to a query. That method was inefficient,
because it executed the query, fetched all Docs
and collected the values.
The autocomplete method we introduced a while back
can answer the same question but much more efficiently.
In order to prevent files from getting too big and
make it easier to implement retention policies, we
are splitting all files into chunks. Each chunk
contains the data for a time interval (1 month per
default).
This first changeset introduces the ClusteredPersistentMap
that implements this for PersistentMap. It is used
for a couple (not all) of indices.
Due to a mistake in Tag which added all strings used
by Tag into the String dictionary, the dictionary
did contain all values that were used in queries.
We are now reading the CSV input without transforming
the data into strings. This reduces the amount of bytes
that have to be converted and copied.
We also made Tag smaller. It no longer stores pointers
to strings, instead it stored integers obtained by
compressing the strings (see StringCompressor). This
reduces memory usage and it speeds up hashcode and
equals, which speeds up access to the writer cache.
Performance gain is almost 100%:
- 330k entries/s -> 670k entries/s, top speed measured over a second
- 62s -> 32s, to ingest 16 million entries
One bottleneck was the blocking queue used to transport entries
from the listener thread to the ingestor thread.
Reduced the bottleneck by batching entries.
Interestingly the batch size of 100 was better than batch size
of 1000 and better than 10.
I was finally able to show that there is a tiny but measureable
effect of this buffer. I think it was not visible before,
because the parsing was too slow. But now, that I replaced the
date parser, the ingestion thread is twice as fast as the
insertion thread. Therefore the buffer makes more sense.
Compared to FastISODateParser.parse, which returns an
OffsetDateTime object, parseAsEpochMilli returns the
epoch time millis. The performance improvement for
date parsing alone is roughly 100% (8m dates/s to
18m dates/s).
Insertion speed improved from 13-14s for 1.6m entries
to 11.5-12.5s.
A specialized date parser that can only handle ISO-8601 like dates
(2011-12-03T10:15:30.123Z or 2011-12-03T10:15:30+01:00) but does this
roughly 10 times faster than DateTimeFormatter and 5 times
faster than the FastDateParser of commons-lang3.
The new datetimepicker can be used to specify date ranges. We no longer
need to define a start date and a range. This simplifies the code
for zooming and shifting considerably.
ParallelRequestsAggregator generates a line plot that shows the number
of parallel requests among the plotted events.
This plot has two issues:
1. It only considers events that are plotted. Events that occur later,
but were started within the plotted time frame are not considered.
2. For performance reasons we are only plotting points when a value
changed. This leads to diagonal lines.
- split the 'sortby' select field into two fields
- sort by average
- legend shows plotted and total values in the date range
- removed InlineDataSeries, because it was not used anymore
Sometimes it is useful to specify the certain y-axis range. For example
when you are only interested in the values that take longer than a
threshold. Or when you want to exclude some outliers. When you want to
compare plots in a gallery, it is very handy when all plots have the
same data-area.
Eventually we want to only support what is now called aggregate, but
not have to implement different plot types. So instead of supporting
percentile plots for dashboards I removed them. You can still get
percentile plots together with the scatter plot.
Scaling big plots to small thumbnails results in bad images that barely
show any details.
We solve this by calling gnuplot a second time to generate the
thumbnails. They don't have any labels and are rendered in the required
size, so that not scaling is necessary.
Thumbnails have to be requested explicitly, because it can be expensive
to compute them.
The last improvement of memory usage introduced a performance
regression. The ingestion performance dropped by 50%-80%, because
for every inserted entry the Tags were created inefficient.
